Re: Fast insertion indexes: why no developments
| От | Leonardo Francalanci |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Fast insertion indexes: why no developments |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1383673960881-5777056.post@n5.nabble.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Fast insertion indexes: why no developments (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Fast insertion indexes: why no developments
Re: Fast insertion indexes: why no developments |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jeff Janes wrote > Some experiments I did a few years ago showed that applying sorts to the > data to be inserted could be helpful even when the sort batch size was as > small as one tuple per 5 pages of existing index. Maybe even less. Cool!!! Do you have any idea/hint on how I could try and replicate that? Do you remember how you did it? -- View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Fast-insertion-indexes-why-no-developments-tp5776227p5777056.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: