Re: PostgreSQL Point In Time Recovery

Alan Hodgson wrote
> Well, yeah. The point was that you possibly could run it for a while to
> "catch
> up" without taking a new base backup if you desired. You should also keep
> copies of it for PITR.

Something like this -
delayed replication
<http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.6/en/replication-delayed.html>   might
help. I could say lag by 12 hours, or 10000 transactions...



--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/PostgreSQL-Point-In-Time-Recovery-tp5775717p5775997.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.