Re: Hot Standby performance issue
| От | ramistuni |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Hot Standby performance issue |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1382736171070-5775972.post@n5.nabble.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Hot Standby performance issue (sparikh <sparikh@ecotality.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Hot Standby performance issue
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Today morning I found that the performance issue on standby database was fixed by itself. On further investigation I found that one of the biggest used in this query had autovacuum kicked in yesterday on primary. The last time it had autovaccum ran was on Sep 30th. I am suspecting that this should have been fixed the issue. The table has update and delete operations. Only thing I did not understand why postgres did not pick this table for autovacuum all these days, in spite of this table is one of the busiest table from DML perspective. I was monitoring the primary database activity all these days and always could see autovacuum was running on another tables. Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Hot-Standby-performance-issue-tp5774673p5775972.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: