Re: Hot Standby performance issue

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От ramistuni
Тема Re: Hot Standby performance issue
Дата
Msg-id 1382736171070-5775972.post@n5.nabble.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Hot Standby performance issue  (sparikh <sparikh@ecotality.com>)
Ответы Re: Hot Standby performance issue  (Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>)
Список pgsql-performance
Today morning I found that the performance issue on standby database was
fixed by itself. On further investigation I found that one of the biggest
used in this query had autovacuum  kicked in yesterday on primary. The last
time it had autovaccum ran was on Sep 30th.

I am suspecting that this should have been fixed the issue. The table has
update and delete operations. Only thing I did not understand why postgres
did not pick this table for autovacuum all these days, in spite of this
table is one of the busiest table from DML perspective. I was monitoring the
primary database activity all these days and always could see autovacuum was
running on another tables.

Thanks.



--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Hot-Standby-performance-issue-tp5774673p5775972.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: sparikh
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Hot Standby performance issue
Следующее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Hot Standby performance issue