Re: Proposal: Make use of C99 designated initialisers for nulls/values arrays
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Proposal: Make use of C99 designated initialisers for nulls/values arrays |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 13800.1570162088@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | RE: Proposal: Make use of C99 designated initialisers fornulls/values arrays ("Smith, Peter" <peters@fast.au.fujitsu.com>) |
| Ответы |
RE: Proposal: Make use of C99 designated initialisers fornulls/values arrays
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Smith, Peter" <peters@fast.au.fujitsu.com> writes:
> From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, 4 October 2019 1:32 PM
>> Also, if we want to pursue, do we want to use INIT_ALL_ZEROES for bool arrays as well?
> FYI - In case it went unnoticed - my last patch addresses this by defining 2 macros:
> #define INIT_ALL_ELEMS_ZERO {0}
> #define INIT_ALL_ELEMS_FALSE {false}
I would say that's 100% wrong. The entire point here is that it's
memset-equivalent, and therefore writes zeroes, regardless of what
the datatype is. As a counterexample, the coding you have above
looks a lot like it would work to add
#define INIT_ALL_ELEMS_TRUE {true}
which as previously noted will *not* work. So I think the
one-size-fits-all approach is what to use.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: