Re: xlog viewer proposal
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: xlog viewer proposal |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1380.1150997375@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: xlog viewer proposal ("Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: xlog viewer proposal
Re: xlog viewer proposal |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com> writes:
> I think it should certainly be able to run on it's own, but it
> wouldn't be that hard to extend the functions so that they were usable
> from within the database or vice-versa.
Yes it would. The most obvious point is that memory management and
error handling conventions inside the backend are quite different from
what you'd expect to employ in a standalone program. Also the means
you'd use for consulting the system catalogs (in that option to provide
readable names for OIDs) are entirely different.
I think asking for support of both environments is a good way to ensure
that this summer project doesn't get finished :-(
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: