Re: Major upgrade of PostgreSQL and MySQL
От | Patrick Dung |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Major upgrade of PostgreSQL and MySQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1379092117.12504.YahooMailNeo@web193506.mail.sg3.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Major upgrade of PostgreSQL and MySQL (Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
From: Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 12:27 AM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Major upgrade of PostgreSQL and MySQL
Patrick Dung wrote on 13.09.2013 18:17:
>> The problem of pg_upgrade is that it needed to hold two set of databases data in the server.
>> This is not be desirable (very slow) or possible (space limitation) for database with huge data.
>>
>> For example, if the old version is already using over 50% of the mount point.
>> The new database may not have enough disk space for the upgrading.
> I think if you use the --link parameter, you don't need additional disk space (or only little).
Thanks for pointing out.
For small or medium sized database, I think file based snapshot (like ZFS) could create backup of the old database quickly.
Also it can rollback quickly.
Thanks,
Patrick
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: