Re: [HACKERS] Re: [HACKERS] Is it necessary to rewrite table while increasing the scale of datatype numeric?
| От | Kevin Grittner |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [HACKERS] Is it necessary to rewrite table while increasing the scale of datatype numeric? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1378481375.60559.YahooMailNeo@web162904.mail.bf1.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Re: [HACKERS] Is it necessary to rewrite table whileincreasing the scale of datatype numeric? (wangshuo@highgo.com.cn) |
| Ответы |
Re: Re: [HACKERS] Is it necessaryto rewrite table while increasing the scale of datatype numeric?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
"wangshuo@highgo.com.cn" <wangshuo@highgo.com.cn> wrote:
> I modified the code for this situation.I consider it very simple.
> It will does not modify the table file, when the scale has been
> increased exclusively.
This patch would allow data in a column which was not consistent
with the column definition:
test=# create table n (val numeric(5,2));
CREATE TABLE
test=# insert into n values ('123.45');
INSERT 0 1
test=# select * from n;
val
--------
123.45
(1 row)
test=# alter table n alter column val type numeric(5,4);
ALTER TABLE
test=# select * from n;
val
--------
123.45
(1 row)
Without your patch the ALTER TABLE command gets this error (as it
should):
test=# alter table n alter column val type numeric(5,4);
ERROR: numeric field overflow
DETAIL: A field with precision 5, scale 4 must round to an absolute value less than 10^1.
--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: