Re: UNNEST with multiple args, and TABLE with multiple funcs

On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 09:44 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at> writes:
> > When adding regression tests, can you please add intentional
> > syntax error cases to exercise all the new ereport()s?
> 
> Please do not add test cases merely to prove that.  Yeah, you should
> probably have exercised each error case in devel testing, but that does
> not mean that every future run of the regression tests needs to do it too.

I disagree.  The next person who wants to hack on this feature should be
given the confidence that he's not breaking behavior that the last guy
put in.