Re: Schema boggle...
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Schema boggle... |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 13773.1068070083@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Schema boggle... ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org> writes:
>> How else would you expect it to work?
> List of relations
> Schema | Name | Type | Owner
> ----------+-----------------------+----------+-----------
> public | categories | table | 186_pgsql
> public | categories_rec_id_seq | sequence | 186_pgsql
> test_001 | table1 | table | 186_pgsql
> test_002 | table1 | table | 186_pgsql
You can get something like that if you say "\d *.*". If you say "\d *"
or equivalently just "\d", then what you see is only the tables that you
could reference with unqualified names. Which does not include the
tables in test_002, because they're hidden by the ones in test_001.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: