Re: timeline signedness

On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 16:20 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 13.08.2013 14:31, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-08-07 at 21:55 -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> WAL timelines are unsigned 32-bit integers everywhere, except the
> >> replication parser (replication/repl_gram.y and
> >> replication/repl_scanner.l) treats them as signed 32-bit integers.  It's
> >> obviously a corner case, but it would be prudent to be correct about
> >> this.  It should be easy to fix in those grammar files.
> 
> +1
> 
> > Here is a patch to fix this.
> 
> If I'm reading this correctly, timeline 0 no longer throws an error with 
> this patch.

Fixed that.