Re: TODO item - tid <> operator

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> This has been saved for the 8.2 release:
>     http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold

Uh, why do we need this at all?  "NOT (tid = tid)" covers the
functionality already.

I disagree strongly with renumbering existing hand-assigned OIDs for
this.  There's too much risk of breakage and no benefit.

Also, you forgot to add the negator cross-links between the operators.

            regards, tom lane