Re: Development schedule

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> If this were an ordinary devel cycle then I'd be fine with it running a
>> year, but I think we really do need to plan for a shorter than normal
>> cycle so we can clean up 8.0 kinks in a reasonably timely fashion.

> Let's see how much 8.0 cleanup we need.  At this point I haven't seen
> any major things needing cleanup.

However, people are asking us for a schedule target now; "wait and see"
isn't the answer they need.  My feeling is that we should bet on there
being some issues, rather than bet on there not being any.
        regards, tom lane