On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 21:34 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah, this is randomly different from everywhere else in PG. The more
> usual convention if you want typedefs for both the struct and the
> pointer type is that the pointer type is FooBar and the struct type is
> FooBarData.
I think that is more useful if you have a really good abstraction around
FooBar, like for Relation, for example. That's not really the case
here. This is more like node types, perhaps.