Re: PRI?64 vs Visual Studio (2022)

Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> We don't even test -Dnls on the Windows CI task, so the fact that it
> passes there doesn't mean much (if our tests would even pick up
> <PRI*64> expansion failure, not sure).  We should probably do
> something about that and/or its absence from the build farm.  We're
> effectively counting on the EDB packaging team or end users to tell us
> if we break localisation on this platform.

I'm pretty certain that we do not test NLS localization at all,
anywhere :-(.  (There are no test cases checking enable_nls,
which would be a necessary thing to not fail on buildfarm critters
not using NLS.)

I agree that starting to rely on PRI?64 in translatable strings
is raising the bar a good deal, so maybe it's time to do something
about that.

            regards, tom lane