Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)
Дата
Msg-id 13718.1583448772@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)  (James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)  (James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com> writes:
> I'm looking at this now, and realized that at least for parallel plans the
> current patch tracks the tuplesort instrumentation whether or not an
> EXPLAIN ANALYZE is in process.

> Is this fairly standard for executor nodes? Or is it expected to condition
> some of this tracking based on whether or not an ANALYZE is running?

No, it's entirely not standard.  Maybe you could make an argument that
it's too cheap to bother making it conditional, but without a convincing
argument for that, it needs to be conditional.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Allowing ALTER TYPE to change storage strategy
Следующее
От: Fabien COELHO
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgbench: option delaying queries till connectionsestablishment?