Re: where EXEC_BACKEND is defined

On 2020-03-20 17:36, Tom Lane wrote:
> One small point is that I believe the existing code has the effect of
> "#define EXEC_BACKEND 1" not just "#define EXEC_BACKEND".  I don't
> think this matters to anyplace in the core code, but it's conceivable
> that somebody has extension code written to assume the former.
> Nonetheless, I'm +1 for re-standardizing on the latter, because it's
> a couple less keystrokes when inserting a manual definition ;-).
> Might be worth mentioning in the commit log entry though.

Ok, done that way.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services