Re: Adding "large" to PG_TEST_EXTRA

Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2023-02-13 13:54:59 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> it seems like this class could eventually include tests that run a long time
>> but don't necessarily eat disk space.  "resource-intensive" is too long.

> I'm not sure we'd want to combine time-intensive and disk-space-intensive test
> in the same category. Availability of disk space and cpu cycles don't have to
> correlate that well.

Yeah, I was thinking along the same lines.

> lotsadisk, lotsacpu? :)

bigdisk, bigcpu?

            regards, tom lane