Re: Enabling Checksums
| От | Jeff Davis |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Enabling Checksums |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1366858772.2646.331.camel@sussancws0025 обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Enabling Checksums (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 2013-04-24 at 21:09 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote: > On 24 April 2013 21:06, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote: > > > What goal are you trying to accomplish with this patch? > > That we might need to patch the checksum version on a production release. Oh, I see. I don't think we need two output fields from pg_controldata though. It's a little redundant, and confused me when I was looking at the impact on pg_upgrade. And it means nothing to the user until we actually have multiple algorithms available, at which time we are better off with a text representation. Other than that, I think your patch is fine to accomplish the aforementioned goal. Essentially, it just changes the bool to a uint32, which I favor. Regards,Jeff Davis
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: