Re: Enabling Checksums
| От | Jeff Davis |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Enabling Checksums |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1366762244.2646.252.camel@sussancws0025 обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Enabling Checksums (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Enabling Checksums
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 16:28 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote: > * make the pg_control.data_checksums field into a version number, for > future flexibility... > patch attached Commenting on this separately because it's a separate issue. I'd prefer that it was some kind of a checksum ID code -- e.g. 0 for no checksum, 1 for FNV-1a-SR3, etc. That would allow us to release 9.4 with a new algorithm without forcing existing users to change. initdb would have to take the code as an option, probably in string form. What do you think? Regards,Jeff Davis
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: