Re: using a lot of maintenance_work_mem

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: using a lot of maintenance_work_mem
Дата
Msg-id 13639.1298058086@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: using a lot of maintenance_work_mem  (Frederik Ramm <frederik@remote.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Frederik Ramm <frederik@remote.org> writes:
> The single query where pg9.0 beat pg8.3 by a country mile was a CREATE 
> INDEX statement on a BIGINT column to a table with about 500 million 
> records - this cost 2679 seconds on normal 8.3, 2443 seconds on 
> large-memory 8.3, and aroung 1650 seconds on 9.0, large memory or not.

FWIW, that's probably due to bigint having become pass-by-value on
64-bit platforms.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Assertion failure on UNLOGGED VIEW and SEQUENCE
Следующее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WIP - Add ability to constrain backend temporary file space