Re: [HACKERS] Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage
Дата
Msg-id 13636.1509657899@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage
Re: [HACKERS] Setting pd_lower in GIN metapage
Список pgsql-hackers
Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> writes:
> On 2017/09/26 16:30, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Cool, let's switch it back to a ready for committer status then.

> Sure, thanks.

Pushed with some cosmetic adjustments --- mostly, making the comments more
explicit about why we need the apparently-redundant assignments to
pd_lower.

I've marked the CF entry closed.  However, I'm not sure if we're quite
done with this thread.  Weren't we going to adjust nbtree and hash to
be more aggressive about labeling their metapages as REGBUF_STANDARD?
        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: PANIC: invalid index offnum: 186 when processing BRIN indexes in VACUUM