Re: Improving the ngettext() patch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Improving the ngettext() patch
Дата
Msg-id 13626.1244125288@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Improving the ngettext() patch  (pg@thetdh.com)
Ответы Re: Improving the ngettext() patch  (Aidan Van Dyk <aidan@highrise.ca>)
Список pgsql-hackers
pg@thetdh.com writes:
>> Russian plural forms for 100, 101, 102 etc. is different, as for 0, 1, 2.

> True. The rule IIRC is that except for 11-14 and for collective numerals, declination follows the last digit.

Wow.  So how does anyone represent that in the .po files?  AFAICT the
notation the gettext machinery provides isn't really powerful enough
for this.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: It's June 1; do you know where your release is?
Следующее
От: Gevik Babakhani
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Question about FUNCDETAIL_MULTIPLE