Re: [gsmith@gregsmith.com: Re: [patch] GUC source file and line number]

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [gsmith@gregsmith.com: Re: [patch] GUC source file and line number]
Дата
Msg-id 1359.1220468139@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [gsmith@gregsmith.com: Re: [patch] GUC source file and line number]  (Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>)
Ответы Re: [patch] GUC source file and line number]
Список pgsql-hackers
Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com> writes:
> On Tue, 2 Sep 2008, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> How about having two new columns "reset value" and "boot value"?
>> 
>> Like it better than "default value" ...

> It's being a bit pedantic at the expense of the user, but I don't really 
> care that much here.  I exposed the boot_val and described it in the 
> documentation as:

> "Default value if the parameter is not explicitly set"

If that statement were the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the
truth, and if it didn't ignore the point about "explicitly set WHERE?",
I'd be fine with it.

> That was why I just picked the more important one 
> and named it "default";

More important to whom?  You are adopting a very narrow mindset,
which seems to be that only DBAs look at this view.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Joshua Drake
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code
Следующее
От: "Greg Sabino Mullane"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code