Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
Дата
Msg-id 13585.1324737976@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на 16-bit page checksums for 9.2  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> After the various recent discussions on list, I present what I believe
> to be a working patch implementing 16-but checksums on all buffer
> pages.

I think locking around hint-bit-setting is likely to be unworkable from
a performance standpoint.  I also wonder whether it might not result in
deadlocks.

Also, as far as I can see this patch usurps the page version field,
which I find unacceptably short-sighted.  Do you really think this is
the last page layout change we'll ever make?
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Merlin Moncure
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: patch: bytea_agg
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2