Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-patches] Phantom Command IDs,updated patch
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-patches] Phantom Command IDs,updated patch |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 13565.1170990926@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-patches] Phantom Command IDs,updated patch (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-patches] Phantom CommandIDs,updated patch
Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-patches] Phantom Command IDs,updated patch |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>> Combo is OK, because it's a *combination* of two CommandIds.
>>
>> That means they are ComboCommandIds or CCIs.
> CCI is CommandCounterIncrement to me, so let's not use that
> abbreviation.
Agreed. I looked for a bit at adding a separate typedef ComboCommandId
to be used where a cid was definitely a combo cid, but it didn't seem to
be very useful to do that...
I'm testing the patch currently. I was a bit surprised to find the
without_oid test failing, but it makes sense because I'm using a
MAXALIGN=8 machine. I suppose Heikki tested on MAXALIGN=4.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: