is allow_nonpic_in_shlib still useful?
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | is allow_nonpic_in_shlib still useful? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1355552618.7997.7.camel@vanquo.pezone.net обсуждение |
| Ответы |
Re: is allow_nonpic_in_shlib still useful?
Re: is allow_nonpic_in_shlib still useful? |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
In the plperl and plpython makefiles we look for a shared library of libperl or libpython, and if it's not found, we check for allow_nonpic_in_shlib, and if that's yes, then we proceed anyway. Apparently, and IIRC, this was set up in a time when those shared libraries were not available through standard builds, but I think that hasn't been the case for quite a while. The only platforms where we set allow_nonpick_in_shlib is linux and freebsd/i386 (presumably an obsolescent combination). Are there any Linux builds that don't supply the required shared libraries? I suspend this hack isn't useful anymore and ought to be removed.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: