Re: XLogArchivingActive
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: XLogArchivingActive |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 13545.1148573028@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: XLogArchivingActive (Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>) |
| Ответы |
Re: XLogArchivingActive
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> This is silly. Why not just turn archiving on and off?
> Not quite. I want online backup, but no archiving. Currently, I have to
> edit postgresql.conf and SIGHUP to "turn on archiving" configuring a
> (hopefully) writable directory, do the backup, edit postgresql.conf and
> SIGHUP again. Not too convenient...
You don't get to count the edit/SIGHUP steps, because those would be the
same for any other GUC.
AFAICS you could get the effect by setting up an archive_command scriptsleep 100exit 1
so that the archiver will do nothing.
BTW, I don't actually understand why you want this at all. If you're
not going to keep a continuing series of WAL files, you don't have any
PITR capability. What you're proposing seems like a bulky, unportable,
hard-to-use equivalent of pg_dump. Why not use pg_dump?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: