Re: Enabling Checksums
| От | Jeff Davis |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Enabling Checksums |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1352738363.3113.55.camel@jdavis-laptop обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Enabling Checksums (Markus Wanner <markus@bluegap.ch>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2012-11-12 at 09:44 +0100, Markus Wanner wrote: > Can we simply write a progress indicator to pg_control or someplace > saying that all pages up to X of relation Y are supposed to have valid > checksums? pg_control would not be the right place for that structure. It's intended to be fixed-size (it's just a serialized C structure) and it should be smaller than a sector so that it doesn't suffer from torn pages. Not a bad approach overall, but requires some kind of new structure. And that increases the risk that it doesn't make 9.3. Right now, I'm honestly just trying to get the simplest approach that doesn't restrict these kinds of ideas if we want to do them later. Regards,Jeff Davis
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: