Re: WIP checksums patch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Davis
Тема Re: WIP checksums patch
Дата
Msg-id 1349111049.15580.49.camel@jdavis
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: WIP checksums patch  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Ответы Re: WIP checksums patch
Re: WIP checksums patch
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 12:35 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> The heap/index files are copied unmodified from the old cluster, so
> there are no checksums on the pages.

That's fine though, the patch still reads the old format the same way,
and the pages are treated as though they have no checksum. How is that a
reason for defaulting the GUC to off?

I'm missing something here. Are we worried about users who turn the GUC
on and then expect all of their old data pages to magically be
protected?

Regards,Jeff Davis





В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [BUGS] BUG #7534: walreceiver takes long time to detect n/w breakdown
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: embedded list v3