Re: WIP checksums patch
| От | Jeff Davis |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: WIP checksums patch |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1349111049.15580.49.camel@jdavis обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: WIP checksums patch (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: WIP checksums patch
Re: WIP checksums patch |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 12:35 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > The heap/index files are copied unmodified from the old cluster, so > there are no checksums on the pages. That's fine though, the patch still reads the old format the same way, and the pages are treated as though they have no checksum. How is that a reason for defaulting the GUC to off? I'm missing something here. Are we worried about users who turn the GUC on and then expect all of their old data pages to magically be protected? Regards,Jeff Davis
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: