Re: Using pg_upgrade on log-shipping standby servers
| От | Jeff Davis |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Using pg_upgrade on log-shipping standby servers |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1342484966.9520.13.camel@sussancws0025 обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Using pg_upgrade on log-shipping standby servers (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Using pg_upgrade on log-shipping standby servers
Re: Using pg_upgrade on log-shipping standby servers |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 11:50 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > I don't think we can assume that because pg_upgrade was run on the > master and standby that they are binary identical, can we? Technically > the user file are identical, but the system catalogs and WAL might be > different, hence my suggestion to run rsync before allowing the standby > to rejoin the primary. Do you have plans to change that in the future? If we know that the user data files are identical between primary and replica, it would be nice if we could provide a robust way to avoid copying them. Regards,Jeff Davis
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: