Re: Schema version management
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Schema version management |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1341956349.14340.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Schema version management (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Schema version management
Re: Schema version management |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On sön, 2012-07-08 at 18:52 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > > On lör, 2012-07-07 at 17:18 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Sure. You need not look further than "/" to find an operator name > that > >> absolutely *will* cause trouble if it's dumped into a filename > >> literally. > > > But that problem applies to all object names. > > In principle, yes, but in practice it's far more likely that operators > will have names requiring some sort of encoding than that objects with > SQL-identifier names will. I'm not sure. The only character that's certainly an issue is "/". Are there any others on file systems that we want to support?
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: