segfault in SQLSpecialColumns when table name is null string
От | Terrence Enger |
---|---|
Тема | segfault in SQLSpecialColumns when table name is null string |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1341922972.25065.19.camel@cougar-natty обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: segfault in SQLSpecialColumns when table name is null string
Re: segfault in SQLSpecialColumns when table name is null string |
Список | pgsql-odbc |
Greetings, This message arises from LibreOffice bug report "SIGSEGV: ODBC to PostgreSQL, renaming column in SELECT list" <https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50849>, but I shall try not to make you read that report. Working with PostgreSQL version 8.4.12-0ubuntu11.04 and with ODBC driver versions 1:08.03.0200-1.2 (supplied with ubuntu-natty (11.04)) and pgsqlodbc-09.01.0100 (built locally), I have managed to provoke a segfault by calling SQLSpecialColumns with a null string for the table name. This call is, of course, a strange thing to do, and I cannot imagine any good result. Still, a segfault seems a disproportionate punishment for doing something silly. The segfault happens in SQLSpecialColumns at odbcapi.c line 790, which reads if (SQL_SUCCESS == ret && 0 == QR_get_num_total_tuples(SC_get_Result(stmt))) The condition tries to dereference stmt->result, which is NULL. Along the way to this result, PGAPI_SpecialColumns at info.c lines 2783 through 2786 detects the bad table name and does an early return. But the return value SQL_SUCCESS seems wrong. When I used gdb to fudge the return value to SQL_ERROR, there was no segfault. Do you need more information? Can I do something else to help? Thank you, all for your attention. Terry. ( I tried earlier to send this message before my address was subscribed, and that earlier attempt is waiting for moderation. If this attempt gets through, I shall ask to moderator to cancel the first attempt. I apologize for the duplication or confusion. )
В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления: