Re: Are scalar type's in/out functions implicitly STRICT?
| От | Tom Lane | 
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Are scalar type's in/out functions implicitly STRICT? | 
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1341.1046400277@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст | 
| Ответ на | Are scalar type's in/out functions implicitly STRICT? (Denis Zaitsev <zzz@cd-club.ru>) | 
| Ответы | Re: Are scalar type's in/out functions implicitly STRICT? | 
| Список | pgsql-sql | 
Denis Zaitsev <zzz@cd-club.ru> writes:
> So, I create some new scalar type and I don't declare its in/out
> functions as STRICT.  But PostgreSQL copes with them such as they
> would be STRICT - they never get the NULL value.
This is likely true in many places --- for example, COPY has a shortcut
because it wants to substitute \N for nulls.  It would not be a bright
idea to assume that it's true in every place and forevermore.  In
general, if you have a C function and don't want to be bothered with
explicit PG_ISNULL testing, you'd better mark it STRICT.
An example of an easy way to crash an I/O function without such guards
is to invoke it explicitly:
regression=# select textin(null::cstring);textin
--------
(1 row)
regression=# select textout(null::text);textout
---------
(1 row)
        regards, tom lane
		
	В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: