Re: We probably need autovacuum_max_wraparound_workers

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: We probably need autovacuum_max_wraparound_workers
Дата
Msg-id 1340913200-sup-8470@alvh.no-ip.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: We probably need autovacuum_max_wraparound_workers  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Josh Berkus's message of jue jun 28 15:03:15 -0400 2012:

> 2) They have large partitioned tables, in which the partitions are
> time-based and do not receive UPDATES after a certain date.  Each
> partition was larger than RAM.

I think the solution to this problem has nothing to do with vacuum or
autovacuum settings, and lots to do with cataloguing enough info about
each of these tables to note that, past a certain point, they don't need
any vacuuming at all.

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: initdb check_need_password fix
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Uh, I change my mind about commit_delay + commit_siblings (sort of)