Re: GiST subsplit question
От | Jeff Davis |
---|---|
Тема | Re: GiST subsplit question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1340732624.12523.1.camel@jdavis обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: GiST subsplit question (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 11:28 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Alexander Korotkov > <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote: > >> So, do we demote that message to a DEBUG1? Or do we make it more clear > >> what the authors of a specific picksplit are supposed to do to avoid > >> that problem? Or am I misunderstanding something? > > > > > > +1 for demote message to DEBUG1. I think it shouldn't be so noisy, it just > > indicates something could be improved. > > Also I think we defenitely need to document secondary split. Now it's no > > chances to understand without reverse engeneering it from code. > > I'm happy to go demote the message if we have consensus on that, but > somebody else is going to need to provide the doc patch. Any takers? I was planning to do that, but it won't be for a few days at least. If someone else wants to do it sooner, feel free. Regards,Jeff Davis
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: