Re: Preferred way to define 64-bit constants?

On sön, 2012-06-24 at 20:23 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> I just committed the patch to change XLogRecPtr into a 64-bit constant, 
> and I did this in the patch:
> 
> #define XLogSegmentsPerXLogId  (0x100000000LL / XLOG_SEG_SIZE)
> 
> But I started to wonder, is that LL representation the preferred way to 
> define 64-bit integer constants? I thought it is, but now that I grep 
> around, I don't see any constants like that in the source tree.

See INT64CONST, UINT64CONST.