Re: libpq version macro to use or not PQsocketPoll
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: libpq version macro to use or not PQsocketPoll |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1340430.1722954664@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | libpq version macro to use or not PQsocketPoll (Dominique Devienne <ddevienne@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: libpq version macro to use or not PQsocketPoll
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Dominique Devienne <ddevienne@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi. Now that v17beta2 is part of my dev-env, I'm trying out the new API.
> And I discover there's no version macro for conditional compilation in LIBPQ...
Indeed, that's an oversight, and there's a number of other things
we added to libpq-fe.h between 16 and 17 that probably deserve
their own LIBPQ_HAS symbols.
> I'm not sure what's so wrong with version macro as such.
A couple of things:
* It doesn't help if we forget to update it, so it's not really
better than HAS_ symbols on that score.
* Usage is error-prone (you might test for the wrong cutoff version)
and not very readable.
* We can't retroactively make such a symbol appear in old copies
of libpq-fe.h.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: