Re: Feature discussion: Should syntax errors abort a transaction?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Davis
Тема Re: Feature discussion: Should syntax errors abort a transaction?
Дата
Msg-id 1340406472.16713.38.camel@sussancws0025
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Feature discussion: Should syntax errors abort a transaction?  (Chris Travers <chris.travers@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 00:24 -0700, Chris Travers wrote:
> I guess it seems to me that I would not object to a new option for
> transaction behavior where one could do something like SET TRANSACTION
> INTERACTIVE; and have no errors abort the transaction at all (explicit
> commit or rollback required) but I would complain loudly if this were
> to be the default, and I don't see a real need for it.

It's already available in psql. See ON_ERROR_ROLLBACK:

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/app-psql.html

Regards,
    Jeff Davis


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: insert select fails inside of function
Следующее
От: Jeff Davis
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: retrieving function raise messages in ecpg embedded sql code