Re: Discarding the resulting rows

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Discarding the resulting rows
Дата
Msg-id 13370.1272313535@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Discarding the resulting rows  (Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>)
Ответы Re: Discarding the resulting rows
Список pgsql-hackers
Jaime Casanova <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Kevin Grittner
>> <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote:
>>> I would use EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT ...
>> 
>> There's some overhead to that, of course.

> he could see the "actual time" in the very first row of the EXPLAIN
> ANALYZE... isn't that a value that is more close to what the OP is
> looking for?

Well, it will include the instrumentation overhead of EXPLAIN ANALYZE,
which can be nontrivial depending on your hardware and the query plan.

On the other hand, EXPLAIN skips the cost of converting the result data
to text form, not to mention the network overhead of delivering it; so
in another sense it's underestimating the work involved.

I guess the real question is exactly what the OP is hoping to measure
and why.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Kevin Grittner"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Discarding the resulting rows
Следующее
От: "Murali M. Krishna"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Discarding the resulting rows