Re: 1.16 beta 1 ?

On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 10:32 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
> <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 09:11 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Monday, May 7, 2012, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> >> > Given that it's self contained, and we *do* expect it to get in
> >> > eventually, how many places would you have to put #ifdef's in to
> >> leave
> >> > the code in the main branch and just not have it build there?
> >>
> >
> > Not much. It would be quite easy to do.
>
> Then I suggest that path.
>

See attached patch.

> >> If Guillaume is going to continue to work on the feature, I'd be happy
> >> with #ifdef's and a configure switch to enable that code.
> >>
> >
> > I want to continue the work on it. But to be completely honest, it isn't
> > my priority. My priority is to get new releases of pgAdmin with the
> > biggest support of the new PostgreSQL features.
>
> That seems like reasonable priorities. But if it were to decent to the
> point of being basically "dead code", it shuld be removed.
>

I agree.

> > I'll work on a patch with the ifdef's. It'll be much less work.
>
> Good.
>

Waiting comments before applying.


--
Guillaume
http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
http://www.dalibo.com