Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Can someone remind me where we left this memory context stuff?
Jan put in some changes to allow palloc()'d space to be freed more
cheaply. The more sweeping rewrite that I was suggesting is not done,
but perhaps we can reconsider it for 6.6 or sometime later. I don't
think we need to worry about it for 6.5.
regards, tom lane