Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 7/3/21 6:59 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> So I think it's ready to go into the buildfarm, modulo any
>> cosmetic work you might want to do.
> Yeah, I'm looking at it now. A couple of things: I think we should
> probably call the setting 'use_clobber_cache_always' since that's what
> it does. And I think we should probably put in a sanity check to make it
> incompatible with any -DCLOBBER_CACHE_* define in CPPFLAGS.
> Thoughts?
No objections here.
regards, tom lane