On ons, 2012-04-11 at 14:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I hear you ... but, given that the source material is a mailing-list
> thread, *somebody* has to do all that work to produce an acceptable
> commit. And if you're just going to commit what that somebody sends
> you without further review, then you might as well give that person a
> commit bit, because you're trusting them to get all this right.
I'd still review it, but I'd be able to spend say 3 minutes on review
and 30 seconds on committing it, versus 3 minutes on review, 3 minutes
on research, and 8 minutes on bookkeeping.