Re: bug in fast-path locking

On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 22:47 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> but other similar paths do:
> 
>   if (!proclock)
>   {
>     AbortStrongLockAcquire();
> 
> I don't think it's necessary outside of LockErrorCleanup(), right?

I take that back, it's necessary for the dontwait case, too.

Regards,Jeff Davis