Re: [BUGS] vacuum analyze corrupts db with larger tuples (< 8k)
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [BUGS] vacuum analyze corrupts db with larger tuples (< 8k) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 13309.947002358@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | vacuum analyze corrupts db with larger tuples (< 8k) (Dirk Lutzebaeck <lutzeb@aeccom.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [BUGS] vacuum analyze corrupts db with larger tuples (< 8k)
Re: [BUGS] vacuum analyze corrupts db with larger tuples (< 8k)] |
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
Dirk Lutzebaeck <lutzeb@aeccom.com> writes:
> ok, here is what I have found out on 6.5.3, Linux 2.2.10:
> [ make table with a bunch of almost-5K varchar fields ]
> # vacuumdb --analyze test
> ERROR: Tuple is too big: size 9604
> vacuumdb: database vacuum failed on test.
Ohhh ... I know what's going on. The oversize tuple is the one that
VACUUM is attempting to store in pg_statistic, containing the min and
max values for your varchar column. In this example, both the min and
max are just shy of 5K characters, so the pg_statistic tuple is too
big to fit on a page.
I had already patched this in current sources, by the expedient of not
trying to store a pg_statistic tuple at all if it's too big. (Then
you don't get stats for that particular column, but the stats probably
wouldn't be useful anyway.)
I suppose I should make up a back-patch for REL6_5 with this fix.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: