Re: Libpq and PGConn
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Libpq and PGConn |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1330.1143670180@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Libpq and PGConn (Keary Suska <hierophant@pcisys.net>) |
| Список | pgsql-interfaces |
Keary Suska <hierophant@pcisys.net> writes:
> Is it safe to assume that in these cases--where a PGconn or Pgresult has not
> been initialized, but has not been finished() either--that all functions
> won't (or shouldn't) choke, will set an error message, and return a defined
> value?
Well, there isn't any place to "set an error message" if you don't have
a PGconn. I think it's reasonable to expect libpq functions not to
crash on NULL pointer inputs, but there's a limit to what we can do
beyond not crashing. Also, if you pass pointers to garbage memory
(rather than NULL pointers) all bets are off; which limits the value of
worrying about the NULL case anyway. Ultimately, if the calling app is
broken enough to pass bad pointers there isn't a lot that a library can
do to defend itself.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: