Re: reducing the footprint of ScanKeyword (was Re: Large writable variables)

Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2018-12-29 16:59:52 -0500, John Naylor wrote:
>> I think 0001 with complete keyword lookup replacement is in decent
>> enough shape to post. Make check-world passes. A few notes and
>> caveats:

> I tried to take this for a spin, an for me the build fails because various
> frontend programs don't have KeywordOffsets/Strings defined, but reference it
> through various functions exposed to the frontend (like fmtId()).  That I see
> that error but you don't is probably related to me using -fuse-ld=gold in
> CFLAGS.

I was just about to point out that the cfbot is seeing that too ...

            regards, tom lane