On 06/08/2024 18:16, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> writes:
>> Hmm, ok I see. Then I propose:
>
>> 1. Revert
>> 2. Just fix the comment to say int64 instead of uint64.
>
> Yeah, it's probably reasonable to specify the output as int64
> not uint64 (especially since it looks like that's what the
> macros actually produce).
Committed
--
Heikki Linnakangas
Neon (https://neon.tech)