Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of Thu Nov 24 15:59:08 +0200 2011:
>
> Well, based on that document, I think that trying to be bug-compatible
> with the JDBC syntax is a, erm, doomed effort. I mean, what are you
> going to do with things like loglevel or logUnclosedConnections that
> change the behavior of JDBC, not PostgreSQL?
The proposition was to ignore keywords not known to libpq (see top of this thread.)