Re: libpq, PQdescribePrepared -> PQftype, PQfmod, no PQnullable

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: libpq, PQdescribePrepared -> PQftype, PQfmod, no PQnullable
Дата
Msg-id 1318235405.31687.0.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: libpq, PQdescribePrepared -> PQftype, PQfmod, no PQnullable  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: libpq, PQdescribePrepared -> PQftype, PQfmod, no PQnullable
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On sön, 2011-10-09 at 11:51 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> The problem with something like a protocol bump is that the coding
> required to make it happen (in the backend and libpq, that is) is only
> a small part of the total distributed cost. 

Why do we have major and minor protocol version numbers, which are
supposed to allow incremental addition of features to the protocol?
What other costs do you have in mind?

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: PostgreSQL - Hans-Jürgen Schönig
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: What is known about PostgreSQL HP-UX support?
Следующее
От: Etsuro Fujita
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WIP: Collecting statistics on CSV file data